Help please

ndubau · **Joined:** Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:04 pm **Posts:** 9

Hello,
I re-use the version 6 of MBM, version I got few years ago. I don't understand why my test doesn't run.
This is the log

Quote:

[01] 6/2 16:14:33 ~ Status: Opening connection for delivery...
[01] 6/2 16:14:33 ~ Status: Connecting to pop.free.fr for POP authentication...
[00] 6/2 16:14:34 +OK POP3 ready <1855958062.1338646473@popn3>
[00] 6/2 16:14:34 > USER ndubau
[00] 6/2 16:14:34 +OK
[00] 6/2 16:14:34 > PASS ******
[00] 6/2 16:14:34 -ERR [AUTH] Error logging in.
[00] 6/2 16:14:34 > QUIT
[01] 6/2 16:14:34 ~ Status: Connecting to smtp.free.fr Port:25
[01] 6/2 16:14:34 ~ Status: Connected
[01] 6/2 16:14:36 220 smtp6-g21.free.fr ESMTP Postfix
[01] 6/2 16:14:36 > HELO [192.168.100.3]
[01] 6/2 16:14:36 250 smtp6-g21.free.fr
[01] 6/2 16:14:36 > MAIL FROM:<noel.dubau@wanadoo.fr>
[01] 6/2 16:14:37 250 2.1.0 Ok
[01] 6/2 16:14:37 > RCPT TO:<noel.dubau@wanadoo.fr> [TEST OF <noel.dubau@wanadoo.fr>]
[01] 6/2 16:14:37 250 2.1.5 Ok
[01] 6/2 16:14:37 354 End data with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>
[01] 6/2 16:14:40 550-5.0.0 Spam Detected - Mail Rejected
550-5.0.0 Please see our policy at:
550 5.0.0 http://postmaster.free.fr/#spam_detected
[01] 6/2 16:14:40 ~ Status: Relaying denied error, let's try ESMTP authentication scheme [1/1]
[01] 6/2 16:14:40 > EHLO [192.168.100.3]
[01] 6/2 16:14:40 250-smtp6-g21.free.fr
250-PIPELINING
250-SIZE 35000000
250-VRFY
250-ETRN
250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
250-8BITMIME
250 DSN
[01] 6/2 16:14:40 > AUTH LOGIN
[01] 6/2 16:14:41 503 5.5.1 Error: authentication not enabled
[01] 6/2 16:14:41 > MAIL FROM:<noel.dubau@wanadoo.fr>
[01] 6/2 16:14:41 250 2.1.0 Ok
[01] 6/2 16:14:41 > RCPT TO:<noel.dubau@wanadoo.fr> [TEST OF <noel.dubau@wanadoo.fr>]
[01] 6/2 16:14:41 250 2.1.5 Ok
[01] 6/2 16:14:41 354 End data with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF>
[01] 6/2 16:14:44 550-5.0.0 Spam Detected - Mail Rejected
550-5.0.0 Please see our policy at:
550 5.0.0 http://postmaster.free.fr/#spam_detected
[01] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: Relaying denied error, giving up!
[01] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: Stage 3 dispatch done [2/1]
[01] 6/2 16:14:44 > QUIT
[01] 6/2 16:14:44 221 2.0.0 Bye
[01] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: Stage 4 dispatch done [2/1]
[00] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: [-????]
[00] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: Closing all streams
[00] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: Creating report...
[00] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: Finishing...
[00] 6/2 16:14:44 ~ Status: Finished.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
État de livraison MaxBulk Mailer [#3] - 02/06/12 *** Courrier d'essai ***
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Version logiciel: 6.8-FR Standard - Enregistré
Système/vitesse: Mac OS 10.7.4/2.8Ghz

Connexions: 5 [Utilisée(s): 1] Serveur unique
Méthode de livraison: Groupé (Traitement des étiquettes désactivé)

Adresse serveur SMTP: smtp.free.fr [Port: Par défaut] SSL Off
Authentification: POP | [192.168.100.3]
Adresse: pop.free.fr [Port: Par défaut] SSL Off
Groupes: 30 [Intervalle: 00:15:00]

Date début livraison: 02/06/12 à 16:14:33
Date fin: 02/06/12 à 16:14:44
Durée totale: 11 seconde(s) - Tentatives: 0/10
Cadence: 0,09 destinataire(s)/seconde

À un total de: Courrier d'essai
Nom liste: inconnu
Envoyé(s): 0
Échoué(s): 1 001 non livré(s) [Connexion fermée par le serveur]
Erreurs: 1

Objet su message: Mise à jour GestBCD2009
Priorité: Normale
Accusé de réception: Non
Format: Texte | iso-8859-1 | quoted-printable
Taille: 1,19 Ko (Pièces jointes non incluses)
Pièces jointes: Aucune

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there anyone to open my eyes ? Thanks a lot !
Noël

stanbusk · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:13 pm **Posts:** 6803

Have you tried to use the ESMTP authentication rather than POP?

ndubau · **Joined:** Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:04 pm **Posts:** 9

Hello,
Sorry for my late answer.
Can you explain me how to configure Thunderbird or MaxBulk for that ESMTP authentification ?
Thanks

stanbusk · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:13 pm **Posts:** 6803

You just need to select 'ESMTP' from the authentication pull-down menu in the 'Settings' panel.

ndubau · **Joined:** Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:04 pm **Posts:** 9

Hello,
Since I asked my question I found that setting ; but the situation is the same ! I also tried to use another smtp (gmail) but always the problem occurs.
ND

stanbusk · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:13 pm **Posts:** 6803

Do you mean you still get the:

550-5.0.0 Spam Detected - Mail Rejected
550-5.0.0 Please see our policy at:
550 5.0.0 http://postmaster.free.fr/#spam_detected

error?

ndubau · **Joined:** Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:04 pm **Posts:** 9

Yes, you're right as you can see on the following delivery status notification in which I just changed the mail adress of the destination.

Quote:

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

ce.xxxxxxxE@ac-bordeaux.fr

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 <ce.xxxxxxxE@ac-bordeaux.fr>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in relay recipient table (state 13).

----- Original message -----

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=message-id:mime-version:from:to:subject:date:x-mailer:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=OFnalME4STo9kD1KKMYe4A/oeoe6vADpfu+ruy9zOMI=;
b=cMPBPhWe9jtSbxUF5Dxrc8BwOAkpJlP6ZuvwY9p0/CxGkY8zoM5VYqgobMnkiORddm
Fot8cVxyH+pc6CLHsiY2/oz35bLDvOML1dd7pp8rZwkCDTopNMPM4iB9E/RDDQKJpK+a
G9NZ2ycilVxH4XQTDTE3+RABycWuTxASFNByZXMiZnRoz9ZigNR4MC/qsLXiaQEXAL3B
5DggW1uHq0JqUylzqZTPYx2dzN3gHyE9608zc5DNZV1TLhKyp8/aMJ/EorN1v6mWq5cm
v+hfbOymRBIzyAW+wQHjtbDjNJiVXUaC26RDXSXXsm+jOEFab9MUZTHwgkY27uukBKzE
3iwQ==
Received: by 10.180.78.228 with SMTP id e4mr13692197wix.4.1339333992424;
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <noel.dubau@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.100.3] (lns-bzn-57-82-249-40-133.adsl.proxad.net. [82.249.40.133])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f7sm26917938wiv.2.2012.06.10.06.13.10
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 06:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <zI3Vx1UicUgf7PVP2N5JdlJzTn17XaV4pbfmGNLkEdJj@wanadoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?\\\"Dubau_No=EBl\\\"?=" <noel.dubau@gmail.com>
To: "64140 Lons" <ce.xxxxxxxE@ac-bordeaux.fr>
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?[Info]_Mise_=E0_jour_GestBCD2009?=
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:13:10 +0200
X-Mailer: MBM 6.8-FR
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Bonjour,
Vous recevez ce courrier pour avoir à un moment donné manifesté de l'intérêt pour le logiciel GestBCD.
Si vous ne l'utilisez plus merci de le signaler pour éviter d'être à nouveau importuné !
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
La version 2009 connaît aujourd'hui une mise à jour qui intéresse les utilisateurs ayant investi dans l'achat d'un lecteur de codes-barres. Ce périphérique facilite l'entrée des codes EAN lors de la saisie de documents via Amazon, évitant la frappe des 13 caractères et les erreurs attachées à ce type d'entrée.
Dorénavant le périphérique pourra être utilisé pour la gestion des prêts. Bien entendu cela suppose l'impression d'étiquettes portant le code-barre spécifique à chaque exemplaire : en effet utiliser le code EAN n'est pas possible pour les documents figurant en nombre dans le fonds sans exiger l'identification de l'exemplaire.
Je conseille le choix des étiquettes d'identification 38,1 x 21,2 mm (chez le fabricant Avery elles correspondent aux types J8651 pour imprimantes jet d'encre ou L7651 pour laser) ; elles existent en d'autres marques et sont au nombre de 65 par feuille ; une boîte de 1625 étiquettes coute environ 30?.
La migration vers cette version se fait suivant les étapes :
- sauvegarde de vos données y compris du dossier Images (Utilitaires / Sécurité / Sauvegarde)
- téléchargement et installation du logiciel sur la page qui lui est consacrée sur mon site (http://ndubau.free.fr)
- récupération des sauvegardes (Utilitaires / Sécurité / Restaurer)
- réintégration des images si besoi : clic sur icône représentant deux flèches blanches sur fond bleu)

Bien cordialement
Noël Dubau

Thanks for your assistance.
Noël

Edit after lookin some notifications :
- some are with the code 550 550 5.1.1
- some with the code 550 5.2.2
- others with no specific code (for me) as

Quote:

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

ce.0590921f@ac-lille.fr

Technical details of permanent failure:
Message rejected. See http://support.google.com/mail/bin/answ ... swer=69585 for more information.

----- Original message -----

Received: by 10.216.196.166 with SMTP id r38mr3440983wen.161.1339270781331;
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <noel.dubau@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.100.3] (lns-bzn-57-82-249-40-133.adsl.proxad.net. [82.249.40.133])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ei4sm18033297wid.5.2012.06.09.12.39.38
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <WwAov0vXmFnvdXm0ti17nsz8uzSU3RQHXu5rjD9xlPBF@wanadoo.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?\\\"Dubau_No=EBl\\\"?=" <noel.dubau@gmail.com>
To: Undisclosed-Recipients:;
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?[Info]_Mise_=E0_jour_GestBCD2009?=
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 21:39:40 +0200
X-Mailer: MBM 6.8-FR
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hope it ihelps !

stanbusk · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:13 pm **Posts:** 6803

Both messages are bounces, first is because the address is bad and second because the message was rejected by Google because it has been flagged as spam.

ndubau · **Joined:** Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:04 pm **Posts:** 9

And so I have no solution to sen my mailing ! I hoped when buying MaxBulk Mailer to have a best result than when I send directly through Thunderbird or other client...
Sniffff !
Noël

stanbusk · **Joined:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 9:13 pm **Posts:** 6803

The Google spam rejection has nothing to do with the software you use, it is because of your message contents, your text contains something the Google spam filter doesn't like. You have to revise your text.

Help please

Who is online